Welcome to %s forums

Stay up to date on Hardstyle and Hardcore parties, releases, free/unreleased tracks, DJ mixes, how to produce and much more. International Hardstyle forum

Login Register

How to sound less FL-Studio-ish?

Sound design and production in general
Forum rules
Kick questions/feedback in these topics ONLY:
* Kick feedback (Get feedback on the kick you made and help others)
* General/how-to kick topic (How to create a certain kick, questions, troubleshooting, etc)
* How is this sound made (Questions, troubleshooting, etc about how to create a certain sound)
Post Reply
User avatar
Binox
State Citizen
Posts: 207
Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 18:59
Location: West-Vlaanderen

Re: How to sound less FL-Studio-ish?

Post by Binox »

Watch Yhimself, a very good artist who uses FL, he even made a video about how he goes around tracks.
His sound design etc, are fenominal.

User avatar
In-toX
State Tourist
Posts: 64
Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 22:59
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by In-toX »

Binox wrote:Watch Yhimself, a very good artist who uses FL, he even made a video about how he goes around tracks.
His sound design etc, are fenominal.
his skills are not 'phenomenal' in a sense, but they are good.

DizNgage
State Newcomer
Posts: 49
Joined: 23 Jun 2010, 21:38

Post by DizNgage »

In-toX wrote:
Binox wrote:Watch Yhimself, a very good artist who uses FL, he even made a video about how he goes around tracks.
His sound design etc, are fenominal.
his skills are not 'phenomenal' in a sense, but they are good.
Judgement is in the eye of the beholder, compared to many producers he is an extremely good producer, there is no ultimate frame of reference for descriptions such as 'phenominal skills', so that comment was pretty redundant.

theres no typical 'FL-Studio sound' (although some say the difference in the audio rendering is better in some DAWs than others), it is to do with what the producer is making and how he is mixing down his track. you are only 16, give it time and eventually you will develop your production and start sounding better :)

my main improvements was when i was creating tracks, and finishing tracks, as mixdown is essential, through learning what to do at the end i was able to adapt it into my process when initially creating the sounds. just keep working, creating tracks and ask others for feedback and you will eventually get there bruv :)
http://www.facebook.com/BipolarDJ - Bipolar - Hardstyle duo - Djs/Producers

Dekkaz
State Senior Citizen
Posts: 274
Joined: 19 Feb 2011, 01:01

Post by Dekkaz »

Ex-peri-ment

User avatar
D-Verze
Artist
Posts: 4972
Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 11:58
Location: Netherlands
Contact:
Netherlands

Post by D-Verze »

DizNgage wrote:
In-toX wrote:(although some say the difference in the audio rendering is better in some DAWs than others)
This is 100% true and exactly the reason I'm getting into Cubase atm.
Also, guys like da tweekaz either make or used to make their tracks in FL, yes.
But they mostly do their final mixdown in Cubase, because it sounds better.
Connect with D-Verze
Image Image Image Image

rigz
State Senior Citizen
Posts: 353
Joined: 10 Jul 2010, 14:53

Post by rigz »

The difference of render between DAW will maybe change like 0.5% of the track quality. We still see a lot of famous track, made by famous producer, on top of the charts made on FL. Guys like Avicii, LaidbackLuke or Afrokacl use fl, are famous, make wourld tour & make € for their track =)

Try to learn the 99.5% other pourcent before changing the DAW ( well, if you are confortable with FL ofc ), witch mean sound design & mixdown.
( Not talking about the mastering that is generaly made by someone else for most of the artist )

User avatar
In-toX
State Tourist
Posts: 64
Joined: 09 Nov 2011, 22:59
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by In-toX »

Darycka wrote:
DizNgage wrote:
In-toX wrote:(although some say the difference in the audio rendering is better in some DAWs than others)
This is 100% true and exactly the reason I'm getting into Cubase atm.
Also, guys like da tweekaz either make or used to make their tracks in FL, yes.
But they mostly do their final mixdown in Cubase, because it sounds better.
the mixdown is fine to do in FL, and the audio rendering is quite the same imo,
afrojack uses FL, look at the quality of his tracks :O

User avatar
SCH
Artist
Posts: 5316
Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 14:00
Location: Västergötland is Bästergötland

Post by SCH »

Darycka wrote:
DizNgage wrote:
In-toX wrote:(although some say the difference in the audio rendering is better in some DAWs than others)
This is 100% true and exactly the reason I'm getting into Cubase atm.
What's the difference between two DAWs that both renders in WAV, 96KHz, 32-bit?
I'm grumpier than you.

Do people even read these?

User avatar
Subject Zero
State Hero
Posts: 4174
Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 18:38
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Subject Zero »

SCH wrote:
Darycka wrote:
DizNgage wrote:
This is 100% true and exactly the reason I'm getting into Cubase atm.
What's the difference between two DAWs that both renders in WAV, 96KHz, 32-bit?
They have different names and user interfaces...



Had to do it :+. The only thing i've always wondered about, is it just me or does FL export in a lower volume? It's always lower than other tracks, but i guess they have been mastered..

User avatar
Q-Rater
State Native
Posts: 546
Joined: 20 Jun 2010, 13:25

Post by Q-Rater »

Darycka wrote:
This is 100% true and exactly the reason I'm getting into Cubase atm.

BA-BOW. It's 100% NOT true

"Before you post a thread about some 'oddity' you have noticed with the sound of FL studio, or want to make a claim that FL Studio sounds superior/inferior to some other DAW, please read this thread and its links carefully. "

http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.php?t=45272

Now your thinking, well ofc Image-Line would say that, but seriously, read it. It makes a bloody good argument.
When will people learn that cheaper doesn't equal worse...
Image
Image
Image
Image

Post Reply

Return to “General / Sound Design”