You said that there was 'nothing remarkable' as in all his tracks suck from all his sets. He has played a variety of hardstyle with heaps of promos in all his sets and if you can't find anything good from any of them then I don't know what you're doing on this site.Vicious wrote:tyri wrote:Obvious bias detected.Vicious wrote:Wow HHZ could shit in a bag and you guys would be all "Amazing TL![]()
![]()
". Nothing remarkable on any Hard with Style sets at all imo.
Nope no bias here, I can appreciate the guys work but most of these sets have been average at best. Hardly worth fawning over like most of the people in this thread have been doing.
Hard With Style
Re: Headhunterz presents: Hard With Style
AgreeVicious wrote:Wow HHZ could shit in a bag and you guys would be all "Amazing TL![]()
![]()
". Nothing remarkable on any Hard with Style sets at all imo.
- diesal11
- State Celebrity
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: 16 Jan 2011, 12:43
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Contact:
He clearly just doesn't like newer hardstyle.tyri wrote:You said that there was 'nothing remarkable' as in all his tracks suck from all his sets. He has played a variety of hardstyle with heaps of promos in all his sets and if you can't find anything good from any of them then I don't know what you're doing on this site.Vicious wrote:tyri wrote:
Obvious bias detected.
Nope no bias here, I can appreciate the guys work but most of these sets have been average at best. Hardly worth fawning over like most of the people in this thread have been doing.
Which is fine, cause IMO older/early hardstyle sounds like a pile of shit anyway lol
https://www.facebook.com/syndromeofficial
DirtyTok wrote:Ohh Diesal you little Tweeke slut
diesal11 wrote:He clearly just doesn't like newer hardstyle.tyri wrote:You said that there was 'nothing remarkable' as in all his tracks suck from all his sets. He has played a variety of hardstyle with heaps of promos in all his sets and if you can't find anything good from any of them then I don't know what you're doing on this site.Vicious wrote:
Nope no bias here, I can appreciate the guys work but most of these sets have been average at best. Hardly worth fawning over like most of the people in this thread have been doing.
Which is fine, cause IMO older/early hardstyle sounds like a pile of shit anyway lol
A 16 year old talking about early hardstyle, I lol'd.
-
- State Celebrity
- Posts: 1422
- Joined: 17 Apr 2010, 21:53
- Location: Utrecht
- Subject Zero
- State Hero
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 18:38
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
- Contact:
No it's not lolRossMcleod wrote:That's the equivalent of him saying:
"A 40 year old talking about new hardstyle, I lol'd."
@Diesal, mate if that "pile of shit" never existed then you wouldn't be listening to all this awful digital age pile of shit
https://soundcloud.com/subjectzero
http://www.facebook.com/SubjectZeroHS
https://twitter.com/Subject__Zero
Previously known as Stuart.
http://www.facebook.com/SubjectZeroHS
https://twitter.com/Subject__Zero
Previously known as Stuart.
- diesal11
- State Celebrity
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: 16 Jan 2011, 12:43
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Contact:
Fine, the kicks lack enough drive for my taste.Qwertz wrote:LOL atleast say early hardstyle is too hard / not cheesy enough for ur taste.

That has to be the worst logic I've ever heard. just cause Hardstyle evolved into what it is now from Early Hardstyle means i have to like both?Stuart wrote:No it's not lolRossMcleod wrote:That's the equivalent of him saying:
"A 40 year old talking about new hardstyle, I lol'd."
@Diesal, mate if that "pile of shit" never existed then you wouldn't be listening to all this awful digital age pile of shit


With that logic you must like all EDM before the late 90's as Early Hardstyle evolved from that. no?
Not to mention my age means nothing in this matter.
It's an opinion guys, get over yourselves.
https://www.facebook.com/syndromeofficial
DirtyTok wrote:Ohh Diesal you little Tweeke slut
- Subject Zero
- State Hero
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 18:38
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
- Contact:
I never said you had to like it? You implied it was a pile of shit (which is funny because i believe you are listening to a pile of shit which branched off from it). Actually i do quite like some of the hard trance in the 90's before some guys started adding heavier basslines and screeches.diesal11 wrote:Fine, the kicks lack enough drive for my taste.Qwertz wrote:LOL atleast say early hardstyle is too hard / not cheesy enough for ur taste.
That has to be the worst logic I've ever heard. just cause Hardstyle evolved into what it is now from Early Hardstyle means i have to like both?Stuart wrote:No it's not lolRossMcleod wrote:That's the equivalent of him saying:
"A 40 year old talking about new hardstyle, I lol'd."
@Diesal, mate if that "pile of shit" never existed then you wouldn't be listening to all this awful digital age pile of shitriiiight......
![]()
With that logic you must like all EDM before the late 90's as Early Hardstyle evolved from that. no?
Not to mention my age means nothing in this matter.
It's an opinion guys, get over yourselves.
Lets get this straight, i don't dislike nu-style. I probably own more nu-style releases (legally) than most of the newcomers that i argue with on here. I can't stand all the trancey/cheesy pish in the scene though (cough digital age/new DBSTF stuff)
https://soundcloud.com/subjectzero
http://www.facebook.com/SubjectZeroHS
https://twitter.com/Subject__Zero
Previously known as Stuart.
http://www.facebook.com/SubjectZeroHS
https://twitter.com/Subject__Zero
Previously known as Stuart.
- diesal11
- State Celebrity
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: 16 Jan 2011, 12:43
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Contact:
We could continue this argument, and eventually settle on the fact that we have a difference in opinion over 1 or 2 pages.Stuart wrote:I never said you had to like it? You implied it was a pile of shit (which is funny because i believe you are listening to a pile of shit which branched off from it). Actually i do quite like some of the hard trance in the 90's before some guys started adding heavier basslines and screeches.diesal11 wrote:Fine, the kicks lack enough drive for my taste.Qwertz wrote:LOL atleast say early hardstyle is too hard / not cheesy enough for ur taste.
That has to be the worst logic I've ever heard. just cause Hardstyle evolved into what it is now from Early Hardstyle means i have to like both?Stuart wrote: No it's not lol
@Diesal, mate if that "pile of shit" never existed then you wouldn't be listening to all this awful digital age pile of shitriiiight......
![]()
With that logic you must like all EDM before the late 90's as Early Hardstyle evolved from that. no?
Not to mention my age means nothing in this matter.
It's an opinion guys, get over yourselves.
OR we could keep on topic lol.
Which is all my original comment was really doing, i wasn't directly trying to have a go at early hardstyle and it's fans (when i apparently have...my bad) I just meant to show that "Vicious" guy that people have different opinions. not start an Early Hardstyle / Current Hardstyle war.
https://www.facebook.com/syndromeofficial
DirtyTok wrote:Ohh Diesal you little Tweeke slut