General purpose thread

[kraczk]

Just FYI, if you want to have bigger resolution, you just remove the zero in the adress of desired cover art, like this: http://screenshot.sh/oeXSxeJCuZBvQ

[Freddy]

Okay, I made some countings: seems like the closest width-height values for 16:9 at this picture is 688x387 (720x405 was what I found, 720 - 2*16 = 688, 405 - 2*9 = 387) and I cut the picture, so it's something like this now:

Spoiler

So if we increase it to 1080p, it will be very blurry, but with the help of interpolation it's possible to make it in a better quality (I think, but maybe I'm writing bullshit). So now?

The cropping you made will make it look not so stretched, but that won't help when increasing size with blurriness. Pixels are pixels.

I tried in PS method best for enlargement and a little bit of sharpening after that, but it really doesn't look any better.

This sounds like something from CSI where they take a blurry cam photo, enlarge 10 times and you can see the eye iris perfectly , that's not how it works in real life.

[Deadwood]

Maybe Frontliner should think about his recent tracks, when everybody just wants to hear his old ones.

[Twixel]

Okay, I made some countings: seems like the closest width-height values for 16:9 at this picture is 688x387 (720x405 was what I found, 720 - 2*16 = 688, 405 - 2*9 = 387) and I cut the picture, so it's something like this now:

Spoiler

So if we increase it to 1080p, it will be very blurry, but with the help of interpolation it's possible to make it in a better quality (I think, but maybe I'm writing bullshit). So now?

The cropping you made will make it look not so stretched, but that won't help when increasing size with blurriness. Pixels are pixels.

I tried in PS method best for enlargement and a little bit of sharpening after that, but it really doesn't look any better.

This sounds like something from CSI where they take a blurry cam photo, enlarge 10 times and you can see the eye iris perfectly , that's not how it works in real life.

If any of you guys have Adobe Illustrator (I've deleted mine) you could have transformed the image in the vector graphic. The picture won't be exactly the same, but you can try it. Than you can enlarge it as much as you can ::

[Valadia]

Okay, I made some countings: seems like the closest width-height values for 16:9 at this picture is 688x387 (720x405 was what I found, 720 - 2*16 = 688, 405 - 2*9 = 387) and I cut the picture, so it's something like this now:

Spoiler

So if we increase it to 1080p, it will be very blurry, but with the help of interpolation it's possible to make it in a better quality (I think, but maybe I'm writing bullshit). So now?

The cropping you made will make it look not so stretched, but that won't help when increasing size with blurriness. Pixels are pixels.

I tried in PS method best for enlargement and a little bit of sharpening after that, but it really doesn't look any better.

This sounds like something from CSI where they take a blurry cam photo, enlarge 10 times and you can see the eye iris perfectly , that's not how it works in real life.

If any of you guys have Adobe Illustrator (I've deleted mine) you could have transformed the image in the vector graphic. The picture won't be exactly the same, but you can try it. Than you can enlarge it as much as you can ::

I've got it, but don't exactly know what you mean.
Could you explain further here or in pm?

[Tomix]

Spoiler

Maybe Frontliner should think about his recent tracks, when everybody just wants to hear his old ones.

Because there are sooo many "old" tracks in that list FB polls mostly end with a retarded result anyway, plus this applies to almost everyone in the scene, if we take these polls seriously

[Twixel]

The cropping you made will make it look not so stretched, but that won't help when increasing size with blurriness. Pixels are pixels.

I tried in PS method best for enlargement and a little bit of sharpening after that, but it really doesn't look any better.

This sounds like something from CSI where they take a blurry cam photo, enlarge 10 times and you can see the eye iris perfectly , that's not how it works in real life.

If any of you guys have Adobe Illustrator (I've deleted mine) you could have transformed the image in the vector graphic. The picture won't be exactly the same, but you can try it. Than you can enlarge it as much as you can ::

I've got it, but don't exactly know what you mean.
Could you explain further here or in pm?

Will do it later today. But if you have time, you can google "image trace in Illustrator". There should be a few easy tutorials

[Valadia]

Quick question, is Venm by Goliath still available for purchase?
I can't find it anywhere

[Katsching]

hey everyone, does anyone own a great quality mp3 version of Brooklyn Bounce - X2X (Deepack Remix)? Of course the full version. I know, icey, you sent me a vinyl cut once but I cant find it anymore and it wasn't really high quality as far as I remember. I would buy it but I cant find it and I really want to play it
can someone help me?

[Valadia]

hey everyone, does anyone own a great quality mp3 version of Brooklyn Bounce - X2X (Deepack Remix)? Of course the full version. I know, icey, you sent me a vinyl cut once but I cant find it anymore and it wasn't really high quality as far as I remember. I would buy it but I cant find it and I really want to play it
can someone help me?

Like this?
Deleted